Flagship dossier · No. III

Reclamation

The Evidence Ledger — environmental accountability, from orbit

Alberta's oil and gas footprint is one of the most surveyed landscapes on Earth — and almost none of that surveying is public. The Ledger watches it from orbit: 99 assessed sites across 13 licensees, each with a machine-readable evidence packet. And its best feature is a mistake it caught in itself.

Golden Gate Book
Dossier III · MMXXVI
Dossier III · Chapter I — The mistake it caught

The audit that rebuilt the method.

The first version of the assessor measured change with seasonal medians — and reported dramatic "recovery" at site after site. An audit caught the flaw: the medians were comparing May/June greenness against July brownness. The instrument was measuring the calendar, not the land. The assessor was rebuilt around month-matched median-of-deltas — each month compared only against the same month in other years — and the phantom recoveries vanished. The arc is the point: a system that catches its own false positives in public is worth more than a system that never admits one.

What broke

Seasonal medians

Comparing a May image against a July baseline reads spring green-up as "improvement." Twenty-seven sites of phantom recovery.

What caught it

The audit pass

A review of the inputs showed the month mismatch. The method's own falsifier — re-run with matched months — killed the finding.

What replaced it

Month-matched median-of-deltas

Each month is compared only against the same month across years, requiring at least two matched months — and the assessment refuses to run otherwise.


Dossier III · Chapter II — The method

Registry, imagery, assessment, ledger.

Four stages, each with stated limits. Detection is allowed; identification is allowed; attribution to a cause is not — the Ledger says what changed, never why, and never who is to blame. That restraint is structural, not stylistic.

Stage 1 — Registry

21,892 geocoded sites across Alberta, located to approximately ±300 m DLS centroids with 500 m assessment buffers. The registry is the population; everything downstream samples from it.

Stage 2 — Imagery

Sentinel-2, 10 m pixels. Freely available, revisit every few days, honest resolution. Ten metres cannot resolve a wellhead — the Ledger never claims to see one.

Stage 3 — Assessment

NDVI/NDMI change signals, month-matched. 99 sites assessed across 13 licensees: 28 with an identified change signal, 71 with no significant change, 3 high-confidence identifications. Below four matched months, no confidence interval is printed at all.

Stage 4 — Ledger

Machine-readable evidence packets, public dashboard. Every assessment ships as a packet — inputs, method version, matched months, signal, confidence — rendered on a live public dashboard anyone can audit.


Dossier III · Chapter III — The record

Ninety-nine sites. Twenty-eight signals. Zero overclaims.

The current recorded state: 99 assessed sites across 13 licensees, 28 identified change signals, 71 with no significant change, 3 high-confidence identifications, 12 sites where no confidence interval is printed. The dashboard is live and public.

99
Sites assessed
28
Change signals identified
21,892
Sites in the registry
MIT
Open source
WHAT IS NOT CLAIMED — Sentinel-2's 10 m pixels cannot prove contamination, legal compliance, causation, methane emissions, or identify individual wellheads. Coordinates are approximate (±300 m). The Ledger detects change and identifies signals; it does not attribute cause or assign responsibility. A signal is an invitation to look closer, not a verdict.